<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2&#215;14: Glyphs Outside the Daycare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.walterslab.com/investigations/2x14-glyphs-outside-the-daycare/682/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.walterslab.com/investigations/2x14-glyphs-outside-the-daycare/682/</link>
	<description>Fringe Investigations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:37:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fringe - Episode 2.14 - Jacksonville - Hidden Glyphs at Daycare &#171; Photomaniacal</title>
		<link>http://www.walterslab.com/investigations/2x14-glyphs-outside-the-daycare/682/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Fringe - Episode 2.14 - Jacksonville - Hidden Glyphs at Daycare &#171; Photomaniacal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walterslab.com/?p=682#comment-101</guid>
		<description>[...] In the meantime, here’s the picture of the daycare. If you’ll look in the bottom left corner, you’ll see the hand, butterfly, flower, seahorse, and frog. They don’t have the imperfections of their glyphic counterparts though — the handprint has only five fingers. It’s a nice little easter egg from the producers. Any significance? If there is, I can’t think of any. Not until we know a little bit about what these glyphs actually mean. See larger image. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the meantime, here’s the picture of the daycare. If you’ll look in the bottom left corner, you’ll see the hand, butterfly, flower, seahorse, and frog. They don’t have the imperfections of their glyphic counterparts though — the handprint has only five fingers. It’s a nice little easter egg from the producers. Any significance? If there is, I can’t think of any. Not until we know a little bit about what these glyphs actually mean. See larger image. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
